Just checking to see that I understand this. So these two pieces of code should result in different behaviour (not sure if you can reference static variables in classes like this, but you get my drift):

class DaClazz {
  8 => static int daVariable;
}
9 => DaClass.daVariable;
DaClazz objektz[7];

------------------

class DaClazz {
  static int daVariable;
  8 => daVariable;
}
9 => DaClass.daVariable;
DaClazz objektz[7];

After the first has executed daVariable = 9. After the second has executed daVariable = 8.

...?

/Stefan

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Stephen Sinclair <radarsat1@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 9:42 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stephen Sinclair;
>
>>
>> Hey, just wanted to mention: i encourage you (chuckers? chuckists?
>> chuckians?) to post bugs here or on the dev list, even if you get
>> little response.  At some point in the future we can do a simple
>> search through the lists for the keyword "bug" and collect them all,
>> so please don't be afraid to make these kind of posts.
>
> I took that to mean you agree this is a bug and not a feature?

Initializing static data is pretty useful, so if there's no other way
to do it then yes I'd agree.
Well, you can do it I guess by sticking initialization code after the
class, but I think your proposal is cleaner.

Steve
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users



--
Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!