sorry it wasn't supposed to come to the list, was supposed to be forwarded to my housemate..
about the code being wrong, i meant the first examples of the thread are wrong, but would be easy to fix based on the rest of the thread..
sorry this end up back in the list as a nonsense message :P
as soon as i get a free moment, i'll sort a comparative example, this will be fun
On 9 October 2012 00:34, Kassen
<signal.automatique@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 11:40:23AM +0100, henrique matias wrote:
> its cool cause the intention is to compare both languages, also very simple
> examples and nice tips..
>
It's a interesting case. Aren't those osc's amongst the UGens
borrowed from SC? I hope so because then the sound and quality should
be the same, with the emphasis on syntax (and other qualities you
might like to measure, of course)
> most of the code is written wrongly, but will be easy for us to fix
>
Hmmmm, I thought most of it was right, only the first two lines had a
issue, I thought. Did I miss problems? I didn't actually try to run
any of it.