dan trueman; er, i coded valueAt() quite some time ago and have been using it for a
while, but i confess i'm not sure it made it into the last release (my fault!).
Well, if Eduard is using it that would mean it would be in there, right? Maybe that's naive reasoning again :¬). Anyway, I don't think there is any reason to apologise for adding features.
i can't check it into cvs at the moment because i have a mess of other stuff in LiSa (multichannel LiSa) that doesn't work properly yet, but if i can't get that cleaned up soon, i'll revert and get valueAt checked in. sorry about this!
That sounds good! I was also talking with Mike about LiSa for granular usage. I think the linear ramps that we have now are good for avoiding clicks in loops but they do tend to place a spectral footprint on shorter, denser grains. I wonder if there would be some way to have more advanced per-voice windowing/enveloping without the syntactic or CPU overhead getting too bad? Might be a thought for a future update? Yours, Kas.