that sure would be good! but i'm just not that organized. i'll try... and i appreciate the critique so no worries there.
I can certainly identify with that :¬).
Maybe we can blame Ge? Blaming Ge always works out well. What if we'd say Ge is The Great Keeper Of ChucK and should be held accountable for making the VERSIONS text line up with the commits that get used? I'm only half joking, it does make sense to me that there should be a strong link between what goes in and the documentation of what went in.
alternatively, we could have .playing(int voice) which returns the 0 or 1....
Sold.
if (my_lisa.playing(3) ) do.something();
looks good to me.
could just have .getbi(int voice). (cute name).
I'm in favour of this. Everybody loves LiSa so maybe LiSa should love everybody back. :¬)
i don't think overloading this makes sense, since it's a boolean and we don't want that to be a float.
I agree, and I couldn't see any useful application for a float there, with .play() at least a float could make sense, like it does with the STK instruments .noteOn().
I quite liked the voice-pan plans I saw in the source as well. This is becoming quite a monster UGen.
Yours,
Kas.