On Sunday, July 8, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Kassen wrote:
Hey Atte,If this is not directly possible, does anyone have an idea for a hack?Shred objects have a .running() and a .done() member function. Thosemight cover your usage case?Rather cludgy workaround; you could have the VM pipe its output to afile, then create a chuck function that would clear the file, call forthe VM status using Std.system( "chuck --status)", then read the file.This would be rather slow.It's odd that this seems so hard. Maybe we need to re-think the statusstuff. I'd like to also repeat that I feel it'd be useful of the chuckcommand, when connecting to a already running VM, would return theresult of it's operation, instead of printing it to the VM's window.It seems that while convenient for human readers the place where thestatus gets returned is rather inconvenient for reading by processes.Yours,Kas._______________________________________________chuck-users mailing list