3 Nov
2007
3 Nov
'07
5:07 p.m.
Martin Ahnelöv wrote:
Hey, guys, before you continue! If this were implemented, ChucK would also get a "control rate", and the CPU-load would be about the same as any other realtime audio (programming) app. The difference would be that you can choose to not use it.
Would it be insane to dream of something like (probably nightmare to implement): SndBuf b => dac; Envelope e => b.rate ; 100 => e.updaterate; // controlrate 100 hz So having updaterate (or simili) on every ugen would allow on a per ugen-instance choice of "control rate". -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://atte.dk | http://myspace.com/attejensen http://anagrammer.dk | http://modlys.dk