>What I wasn't able to do was end arbitrary shreds in the Mini's console monitor without using the mouse (and thus depend on visual feedback), you can navigate the table of shreds using only the keyboard and >all fields are labelled in plain text but on my Linux install I couldn't get the keyboard control to go to the table itself and hitting enter on the field that should remove the shred didn't do a thing.
Yes, if there was a keyboard command to bring focus to the table of schreds and keyboard commands for removing and whatever else you can do with each schred, theis would help tremendously.
>How far would those two additions get you? I think those would be nice to have for anyone and might especially enable people on a screen reader to navigate the whole program and those wouldn't require >anything near the effort of a whole re-write of the Audicle.
Agreed, I think they would be very helpful additions.From altern's message on this thread, it seems that Java Swing will interface with OSC, and Sun has put a lot of work into making this toolkit accessible. Thus, when you use a standard swing control in your program, Java knows how to:1. keyboard enable this by default2. communicate the state of the control to the access technology (screen reader)I'll have to check this out more thuroughly. Perhaps it would be more effective to write the UI in Java, but XUL just seems to be a natural for writing UIs.In any case, thanx for all the responses to my message. I'll post more when I've tried a few things...-- Rich
----- Original Message -----From: KassenSent: Monday, November 19, 2007 6:01 PMSubject: Re: [chuck-users] Controling Chuck - building accessible GUIRich,
You only mention the Audicle and not the MiniAudicle. The Mini is considerably more simple, I never used a screen reader but as far as I can see the Mini uses very straightforward text labels with the exception of a few icons that are also reachable by hotkeys.
What I wasn't able to do was end arbitrary shreds in the Mini's console monitor without using the mouse (and thus depend on visual feedback), you can navigate the table of shreds using only the keyboard and all fields are labelled in plain text but on my Linux install I couldn't get the keyboard control to go to the table itself and hitting enter on the field that should remove the shred didn't do a thing.
How far would those two additions get you? I think those would be nice to have for anyone and might especially enable people on a screen reader to navigate the whole program and those wouldn't require anything near the effort of a whole re-write of the Audicle.
Much like Stephen I find the whole question quite mysterious, I never used a screen reader but my first guess would be that a a plain text editor with a command-line should be a perfect match for one, perhaps I don't understand completely what you are after?
To answer your other question, you won't get a thing out of ChucK without writing some code but the good news is that per line of code you can get a lot of sound. On the forum we've been playing a game of getting the most interesting sounds out of one or two 80 character lines with very interesting results, in a few paragraphs you could write a small synth controlled by MIDI or a joypad and from there on it's good riddance to the whole screen with regard to playing music. I can't imagine the exact nature of your challenge but I would guess that ChucK might well suit your needs.
Yours,
Kas.
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users