Kas:
Actually, an ouro contains a *reference* to a boros and vice versa.
There nothing bestial about that -- in fact it's a useful and often
appropriate construct.
You're just trying to goad me into writing that wiki entry on ChucK
references, aren't you? :)
-Rob
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 2, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Kassen
Robert;
Is this because Boros is a forward reference? And is this not a bug?
Actually I'm quite surprised you got the second version to compile at all. You are defining a chicken as something that comes out of a egg, while a egg is something that comes out of a chicken.
On behalf of your cpu and ram I suggest you stop doing this; if every Ouro contains a Boros (which in turn contains a Ouro (which in turn contains a Boros (which in turn contains a Ouro (which in turn contains a Boros (which in turn contains a Ouro (which in turn contains a Boros (which in turn contains a Ouro (which in turn contains a Boros(which in turn contains a Ouro (which in turn contains a Boros (which in turn contains a Ouro (which in turn contains a Boros ( and so on )))))))))))) then there will be trouble.
Yours, Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users