I just wanted to bump this and offer my small and humble opinion;
To me it's a sort of utopia to have this amount of open-ness about the process of ChucK's development. It's therefore quite odd to me that there isn't more debate on the sugested features and that only a very small group of people has added desirered features and there is hardly any discussion at all about which ideas are good and which ones are silly/redundant/dangerous.
Why isn't there more debate?
Kas.
On 8/8/07, Ge Wang <gewang@cs.princeton.edu> wrote:
Greetings!
We are nearing the next very sporktacular release of ChucK and want
to coordinate with you on organizing and prioritizing some bug fixes/
features/updates. We've been scouring through the forums, wiki
pages, and posts and collected much good info. Thanks to all who
have been kind and patient enough to enter requests, reports, and
suggestions into the various pages. At this stage, we'd like to get
your input on prioritizing them for the new release (in about 2
weeks). For this purpose, we've created two new wiki pages for
feature requests/reports and bug reports/requests from here:
http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Bugs
http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Features
Please enter full descriptions and concise accompanying code when
helpful. While we can't guarantee that these would make it into the
immediate next version, they are very helpful in getting a sense of
disaster zones that needs more urgent attention, and is a chance to
tidy up the information. If you don't want to deal with the wiki
directly, feel free to post here or to chuck-dev, and our uh wiki
specialists will transfer the text there.
As for the manual, let's keep going here:
http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Manual
Thank you very much! Let us know if you have any questions.
Keep on ChucKin'
Best,
chuck team
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users