![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d5504a3bcc89ea6c436c21e7898bca9e.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
17 Dec
2005
17 Dec
'05
4:40 a.m.
Ge Wang wrote:
> chuck --bufsize128 foo.ck
That would translate to 1/44100 * 2 (stereo) * 2 (16 bit is two bytes) * 128 = 11,6 ms of latency, right?
Try different powers of two to hopefully find a good balance between latency and stability.
That works great. Chorus still seems to be quite hungry. One aspect I still need to try out is using a single one and not two Chorus'es since it's now stereo as far as I unerstand. An even better way would be to direct all voices through the same Chorus, although I haven't tried that yet. -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk