31 Oct
2007
31 Oct
'07
3:45 p.m.
Hi, Some examples on papers 2004, like this one, http://soundlab.cs.princeton.edu/publications/on-the-fly_nime2004.pdf use things like: 100::ms +=> now; I don't understand exactly the meaning of that, but I think it should be the same as: 100::ms => now; Is that notation depreciated? Because that line is crashing ChucK, this simple program: //---------------------- <<< "now" >>>; 1::second +=> now; //---------------------- Gives a segmentation fault message (on Linux at least). Thanks for your help, Juan-Pablo