Re: [chuck-users] priorities for next release

I totally agree that there should be some more effort put toward allowing users to create more Ugens, however, I think that because Chuck is also an academic exercise for the Princeton folks, adding features to the language itself is a higher priority than adding more instruments, IMHO. Mike On 8/16/07, chris beck wrote:

To me, it seems like the most important thing is to add more preset instruments and make it easier to create your own instruments. At the moment, we have a pretty broad set of instruments, but it could certainly be expanded. Also, the interfaces to them are not entirely standardized. The concept of an instrument could be abstracted more within chuck, which would be an asset to the programmer.

Just my 2 cents, Chris

On 8/15/07, joerg piringer wrote:

...

Kassen schrieb:

...

I agree a include statement/dependency finding should be at the top. This will not only open the way for easier management of larger projects but it will also allow for easy sharing of tools and extentions which would be good for community building. Practically speaking it would lower the treshold for contributing to ChucK from knowing C++ to knowing ChucK which I think is a big deal.

and ah yes! i forgot a very important issue: EXTERNALS! i have a couple of ideas that could be easily implemented with external dlls or dynamic libraries. like for example text to speech (flite) or an openGL display.

best joerg

-- http://joerg.piringer.net http://www.transacoustic-research.com http://www.iftaf.org http://www.vegetableorchestra.org/ _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu

https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

...

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- http://shadowofaculture.blogspot.com