Re: [chuck-users] assignment (BUG?)

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 7:19 PM, Robert Poor wrote:

FWIW, I did stumble over an example where => and @=> differ.  I typed

       noisemakers[x] => Noisemaker @ current_noisemaker;

which tried to patch noisemakers[x] into a null unit generator, producing some strange runtime error.  Of course what I intended was:

       noisemakers[x] @=> Noisemaker @ current_noisemaker;

So sometimes you just have to ask "please" to get ChucK to do the right thing.

Okay, that's a valid use case. ;p -- Tom Lieber http://AllTom.com/