Yes, it's unavoidable that things like this will lead to questions, butquestions are good. Let's be happy so many aspects of ChucK are so questionable! ;¬)
and occasionally upchuckable!
Seems like a sub-section of "cross-chucking" in some way as well. Might be functionality we should have, funny how it only comes up now in this way.
jah, it's interesting i agree, and would be nice to be able to do. it might also cause great internal chuck misery for Ge to implement! i'm sure he'll let us know....
would mean in the case of writing single values and it gets more complicated;
buf.valueAt(i) +=> lisa.valueAt( i::samp);
that's pretty cool....
That doesn't sound unreasonable to me either (basically it's a sort of mixing over-dub). Perhaps we should simply round to the nearest integersample so people who have their own opinion on what interpolated writes mean in this context can implement that themselves in ChucK?
i think for now that's the way it'll have to be, but there is at least a basic linear interpolation (or exterpolation) i could add for the writing function that wouldn't be hard. hopefully before the next release.... thanks! dan
Yours, Kas.