Stephen;<div><br>There are advantages and<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
disadvantages in both cases.<br><br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I agree. SC proponents tend to argue that their client-server structure means not glitching the audio when the cpu runs out of steam. I&#39;m sure that&#39;s true, but when the cpu runs out something will have to give, no matter what.</div>
<div><br></div><div>In SC you know the sound will stay coherent for longer, in CK you can recover from such issues, and know the sync between the sound and the controlling structures will recover too, though there will be glitches in such cases.</div>
<div><br></div><div>This is a trade, as most things in computers are. It might be a good one for you or a bad one. I still feel it&#39;s insignificant compared to our ability to fluently express what we mean, in the chosen syntax. Of course what we mean to express may well depend on either fluent audio or on sample level accuracy.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Yours,</div><div>Kas.</div></div></div>