How about 
  likely(n)
... where 0 <= n <= 1.0, which will return true with a probability of n.  Even better, just make n an optional arg to maybe(). 

Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 3, 2010, at 9:29 AM, Kassen <signal.automatique@gmail.com> wrote:



2010/9/3 Rebecca Fiebrink <fiebrink@princeton.edu>
OR, because it's chuck and therefore more fun than your average language:


Ok, that's it. 

Let's have "probably" and "perhaps" at 75% and 25% as well. Everyone loves "maybe" so much, we might as well have more of it.

Does English have single words describing indeterminate times and/or durations that aren't already reserved or would be confusing? We talk about "in a bit" or "in a while" but those sound like they would be cause for confusion. "soon" might be a good one?

Kas.
_______________________________________________
chuck-users mailing list
chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu
https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users