Re: [chuck-users] chuck vs supercollider?

A quick and fun way to work with Chuck in a distributed model is to form a laptop orchestra! Yours truly, David On 2012-08-12, at 10:15 AM, Kassen wrote:

On 12 August 2012 10:28, Atte André Jensen wrote:

...

I seem to remember Ge saying something like "first we make it work, *then* we make it fast", however development of chuck stopped before the last part was started :-(

I don't think it "stopped" as such, there has been some activity, for example the "Chugins" that we know are in the pipeline. Because of that I'd place the focus on a lack of communication, but I can see where you are coming from :-/.

Making stuff "fast" while keeping all of the benefits we talked about above may not be that simple, even. Particularly not now that "fast" has come to mean "using multi-threading". Then again; that might be good. That makes it a interesting problem to work on (good for programmers) and I'd say there would be a paper or two in a solution (good for researchers).

For less structural issues I'd just like to refer back to my notes on a distributed model as a way of taking away some of that dev-time bottleneck. I said enough about that, there's a line between friendly advice at times and non-stop whining :-)

Yours, Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

------------------------------------------------------------------- Dr. David Ogborn, Assistant Professor Communication Studies & Multimedia Director, Cybernetic Orchestra & ESP Studio McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada ogbornd --at-- mcmaster.ca http://davidogborn.net http://twitter.com/ogbornd http://esp.mcmaster.ca (Cybernetic Orchestra) 1-905-525-9140 ext 27603