Re: [chuck-users] waveform generation by function

Kas, Thanks. Being new to Chuck I wanted to make sure that there wasn't a more standard way of doing this. Sample On Sun Aug 5 08:23:02 2012, Kassen wrote:

On 05/08/2012, Sample Hampton wrote:

...

Users,

Hey Sample,

...

What is the best way to do waveform generation--one sample at time of course--with math functions? First I tried chucking a variable straight to the dac, but it didn't take. Then I tried chucking a variable to the value of a Step, and chucking the Step to the dac. That did work, and below I have a simple lpf'ed sawtooth going. Is there, however, a more conventional and direct way of doing this?

No, I think this is about it. You can also use Impulse, instead of Step, but for your usage it doesn't make much difference. I'd say this is already quite direct, your code is compact and clear, isn't this good enough? I suppose writing numbers straight to the dac would be even more compact, but that would als make things a bit more ambiguous.

Yours, Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users