Re: [chuck-users] determining the type of an Object in code

mike clemow;

I wanted to write a class that would abstract arrays like the Collection class in SuperCollider. I guess I can't. I would have to write a class for each type of object that I wanted to make Collections of.

I think you are right. I'd like a way to address arrays because there are many things one might like to do to arrays that don't depend on the type; removing a object, inserting one, randomising or reversing the order of the locations, etc, and right now you can't. The same goes for Ugens, it might be nice to be able to reason about those in a more abstract way, for example to re-connect them yet I don't think you can write a function that takes something of type "Ugen" as a argument or returns one. Yours, Kas.