Re: [chuck-users] chuck, PD and OSC

I didn't use flext because I am old and my brain is tired. brad http://music.coumbia.edu/~brad On May 19, 2008, at 5:42 AM, Luigi Rensinghoff wrote:

Hmm

I am mainly a PD User but had a short look into chuck....

For now i cannot grasp the capabilities that a chuck~object brings into max or PD, but i am very interested..

Its a shame you didnt use "flext" (you know it ??)

http://www.parasitaere-kapazitaeten.net/ext/flext/

That way we had a PD-object as well..

Since i am not a programmer i cannot do the port, do you think it is a lot of effort ???

Thanks Luigi

Am 06.12.2007 um 18:10 schrieb garton@columbia.edu:

...

Quoting Stephen Sinclair :

...

Some day I'd like to see a standardized shared-memory approach to passing OSC messages, which would be insanely fast on a local machine. (Though, I believe that local loopback sockets are often implemented using shared memory, and are thus pretty much just as fast. Not sure if this is the case in Linux, I've been meaning to look it up for a while)

My preference is to dump OSC entirely, and use some kind of loadable/imbeddable scheme. It would be just fun fun fun to put the entirety of ChucK into a loadable lib of some kind, and then find the entry-points you want from your calling environment and go go go.

This is how [chuck~] works, by the way,

brad http://music.columbia.edu/~brad _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users