On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 07:39:03PM -0400, Matt Bard wrote:
Kas,
So, I went ahead and updated to 1.2.1.3 last night.
Great, congratulations!
I noticed the error with .loopRec is gone.
Also good, we'll get there :-)
However, my issue persists. Apparently I misunderstand something. Here is a portion of my code:
Ok, let's have a look.
if (func == 1) { //looper.clear(); //Causes a RT error with Jack
Right, that is simply a ChucK bug then, with some luck Dan Trueman (LiSa's "father") will have a look at what is wrong there.
//0 => looper.loopRec; //Does nothing 0 => looper.play; //Record
Here I am scratching my head; does the combination of the code and comment imply that you would like "not playing" to equal "recording"? That would be a interesting way of working, but it's not true. .play starts and stops playback and .record starts and stops recording. .loopRec is a bit like .loop, .loop only works when playing and in that case makes playback loop, while .loopRec only affects recording and sets whether recording -when it happens- works in a looped fashion.
It seems that loop recording begins after I set a feedback level (I'm cool with that), but how do I get out of loopRec mode if not with the commented out line? Also, if I call .clear() or call .duration, I get a realtime error from Jack and it shuts down. I'm sure I'm missing something. Could you point me in the right direction?
I think here might be the reasoning error; the "loop" in loopRec refers to looping in time, not to a signal feedback loop (that may also exist). loopRec means that as the recording position reaches the end of the buffer it'll "loop" back to the start. Maybe I am reading you wrong, but so far that seems to be it.
Also, if I call .clear() or call .duration, I get a realtime error from Jack and it shuts down. I'm sure I'm missing something. Could you point me in the right direction?
Well, those two are simply plain bugs; things should not shut down over simple function calls. .clear() I'm not sure about, I don't think I ever had to use it, but I really thought .duration was fine. That's strange. How far does that get you? Or am I misunderstanding something? Yours, Kas.