*grin* Code completion was actually one of the original design goals of miniAudicle, and has been sort of ominously perched on my internal todo list since the beginning. The biggest difficulty with code completion right now is that one essentially needs to parse most or all of the relevant code to make it work. Ive recently realizeed that the way many tools (Xcode, Eclipse) do this is to actually use the full compiler to get some sort of abstract syntax tree and then go from there, instead of more simplistic text processing. spencer On Jun 10, 2007, at 12:43 PM, Leuthold Dominik wrote:
hi all
i'm a bit surprised that "code completion" wasn't mentioned till now. (or is it already in the wishlist?) i'd really like to see something similar like m$ IntelliSense implemented in the mini. (hehe... i like my visual studio:-) i'm often in the situation that i'm not sure how to spell a specific command (uppper/lowercae, or eg. is it keyOn?, or noteOn?) or that i'm not sure about the type of parameters for a function. therefor i always need to look in the documentation wich is really time consuming.
in my personal opinion, a code completion would speed up coding a lot.
jassas /moudi
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users