Re: [chuck-users] timing without audio?

Recently, i found that I have to turn audio on, otherwise the timing runs way too fast. (Only an issue, I guess, if you're needing it to be accurate and not just fast.) rs On Thursday, October 30, 2014, Forrest Curo wrote:

As I understand it, you send some number to 'now' and for that length of time the confuser will continue to run whatever oscillator instances you've started, then go on through your code.

So if you only used it to generate values to trigger voices and changes in other software, you could run Chuck without much overhead?

Is this right, and how can I minimize that overhead?

[Forrest Curo San Diego]