Hi Kassen, Your understanding of of multi-dimensional arrays is correct. This bug seems to occur because ChucK uses a different instruction for accessing multidimensional arrays, which seems to disregard associative/string indices. This is something that can hopefully be cleaned up pretty quickly. One quick fix for this goes as follows: int bar[3][8]; 3 => bar[0][0]; 5 => (bar[0])["test"]; <<< bar[0][0] >>>; <<< (bar[0])["test"] >>>; But ideally one would not need to use parentheses to enforce correct array access behavior. Thanks for reporting this. spencer On Nov 21, 2006, at 12:00 PM, Kassen wrote:

Hi list, some more arrays for fun and (potential?) profit....

//this goes well; int foo[8]; 3 => foo[0]; 5 => foo["test"];

//let's make sure <<< foo[0] >>>; <<< foo["test"] >>>;

//that was fun! //lets do it again in 2D!

//fine int bar[3][8];

//fine 3 => bar[0][0];

//not so fine 5 => bar[0]["test"];

//we never get here <<< foo[0][0] >>>; <<< foo[0]["test"] >>>;

Why is this? Is this a bug? Missing feature? Complete misunderstanding of how to combine polydimentional arrays and sociative-ness?

ChucK claims foo goes out of bounds but I suspect it's either a bug or a syntax error because frankly I can't see how I could prevent 5 => bar[0]["test"]; from going out of bounds.

Yours, Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users