Hello all, I've recently begun looking into using ChucK a little for odds and ends. It's a very interesting language. In fact, I just wrote a guitar (audio) looper capable of simple looping and overdubbing (to replace a stompbox). While it appears that everything works just fine, I am encountering enough latency to cause noticeable problems in my musical timing. I've tried reducing the buffersize down to 64 and I've attempted to use the --level110 command, but --level always informs me that it isn't capable of changing the schedule for some reason. I'm running Windows 7 on a simple laptop with the default soundcard (yes, I know that's pretty rough). Regardless, I was wondering if anyone had any tips on how to lower the latency? And how could I adjust the priority of ChucK? Thanks,Matt
Hi Matt!
I ran into this same problem. What worked for me was using a version of
ChucK compiled for ASIO. Check out this:
http://electro-music.com/forum/topic-18931.html
2012/2/26 Matt Bard
Hello all,
I've recently begun looking into using ChucK a little for odds and ends. It's a very interesting language. In fact, I just wrote a guitar (audio) looper capable of simple looping and overdubbing (to replace a stompbox). While it appears that everything works just fine, I am encountering enough latency to cause noticeable problems in my musical timing. I've tried reducing the buffersize down to 64 and I've attempted to use the --level110 command, but --level always informs me that it isn't capable of changing the schedule for some reason. I'm running Windows 7 on a simple laptop with the default soundcard (yes, I know that's pretty rough). Regardless, I was wondering if anyone had any tips on how to lower the latency? And how could I adjust the priority of ChucK?
Thanks, Matt
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
participants (2)
-
Kyle Hipke -
Matt Bard