Atte André Jensen wrote: Still, would it be possible (and what would it take) in chuck to inherit from StkInstrument and get the bennefits of streamlined instruments?

I thought there was going to be a somewhat documented more or less streamlined kit for including your own instruments in the ChucK source. Can't remember where I read that. That would probably mean DSP coding in C, I think. This was somewhere on the ToDo list but loads and loads of things are on that list (actually I think there are several lists). I think I read that poking around the Wiki. So; that would mean "probably" and "somewhere in the future", I think? I have a homebrew filter on the shelf that's realy inneficient in straight ChucK that I'd like to port myself but something tells me this isn't going so simple and cheerfull as ChucK itself... Hope that answers some of your question untill the chief mad scientist himself returns from France. Kas.

On 6/16/06, Perry R Cook wrote:

Yea, give Ge a break. He's on his honeymoon!!

Hey, Perry, you seem a bit older then the rest of us so hopefully wiser and more experienced too. Where does one find a partner willing to plan a honeymoon that fits with IRCAM events? I mean; I managed to find friends that can deal with being incomunicado for a few weeks because chucking binges but this seems to be the next level. Kas.

uh, here is a synopsis in code... Girlfriend manman; manman $ wife + ge => Paris => Blois => Loire Valley => Rouen => Normandy => St. Michel => Bordeaux => Nimes => Arles => Avignon => Nice => Aix en Provence => Paris => New Jersey; 2::week => now;

...

On 6/16/06, Perry R Cook wrote:

...

Yea, give Ge a break. He's on his honeymoon!!

Hey, Perry, you seem a bit older then the rest of us so hopefully wiser and more experienced too. Where does one find a partner willing to plan a honeymoon that fits with IRCAM events?

I mean; I managed to find friends that can deal with being incomunicado for a few weeks because chucking binges but this seems to be the next level.

Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 07:11:26PM -0400, Spencer Salazar wrote:

With regards to building your own unit generators, if you already have a C or C++ implementation of your instrument/filter/etc., its not too difficult to integrate that at compile-time into ChucK--there is a fairly straighforward mechanism for defining new ChucK classes and ugens, including fancy things like inheritance. Id say the only thing stopping users from implementing new compiled-in ugens right now is the lack of documentation.

Wow! I knew about the run-time plugin mechanism that's currently on hold, but I didn't know that there's a "not too difficult" way of compiling-in your own ugens. Anybody that knows how to do this and would be willing to write a short tutorial? Please... - ttg