Hey all, I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK? I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something). I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate... I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up. Any thoughts? --ss [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] S c o t t S m a l l w o o d composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
===============
Stephen David Beck
Haymon Professor of Music
Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media
Louisiana State University
Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
http://avatar.lsu.edu
O: 225-578-2594
C: 225-223-0344
skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood
Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
Hi, I'm not C++ dev, so I won't help you with the serial implementation, but from the teaching perspective I think it's a very good idea (and actually some opportunity) to teach beginers solving problems with different tools and use interoperability protocols like OSC or MIDI. The very next time your students need some graphics or camera as a sensor, they know it's easy to use some other tools, like Processing and connect it with ChucK or whatever they use. There is a lot of good commercial software that works just fine with these protocols, so then after the course is over, your student will be used to connecting software in all directions. The classic example for me is using Modul8 - OSX VJing software that has quite a complete OSC namespace, so you can easily use it with SC3 or ChucK to create advanced, interactive visualizations during the performance. trzewiczek On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Stephen David Beck wrote:
I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
=============== Stephen David Beck Haymon Professor of Music Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
O: 225-578-2594 C: 225-223-0344 skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood
wrote: Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
I agree that OSC is good to teach - and I always do... but again, most of my students are beginners, and my preferred approach is teach a sound programming environment, then map controllers via laptop controls, MIDI, then HID, then raw sensors via serial / Arduino. It's just a nice package. THEN OSC comes into play for interfacing between iphones, other environments, wireless devices, etc. But you are correct: it's really important to introduce these protocols as early as possible so that students can navigate all of these environments effortlessly... The other issue is really just ChucK's selling point. It is the only sound programming environment I know of that doesn't have any serial i/o capability... and it seems like a good idea to me to address this. Anyway, that's my 2 cents... --ss On 2012-03-04, at 2:09 PM, trzewiczek wrote:
Hi,
I'm not C++ dev, so I won't help you with the serial implementation, but from the teaching perspective I think it's a very good idea (and actually some opportunity) to teach beginers solving problems with different tools and use interoperability protocols like OSC or MIDI. The very next time your students need some graphics or camera as a sensor, they know it's easy to use some other tools, like Processing and connect it with ChucK or whatever they use. There is a lot of good commercial software that works just fine with these protocols, so then after the course is over, your student will be used to connecting software in all directions. The classic example for me is using Modul8 - OSX VJing software that has quite a complete OSC namespace, so you can easily use it with SC3 or ChucK to create advanced, interactive visualizations during the performance.
trzewiczek
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Stephen David Beck wrote:
I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
=============== Stephen David Beck Haymon Professor of Music Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
O: 225-578-2594 C: 225-223-0344 skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood
wrote: Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] S c o t t S m a l l w o o d composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
totally! would be great for it to have serial! On Mar 4, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Scott Smallwood wrote:
I agree that OSC is good to teach - and I always do... but again, most of my students are beginners, and my preferred approach is teach a sound programming environment, then map controllers via laptop controls, MIDI, then HID, then raw sensors via serial / Arduino. It's just a nice package.
THEN OSC comes into play for interfacing between iphones, other environments, wireless devices, etc.
But you are correct: it's really important to introduce these protocols as early as possible so that students can navigate all of these environments effortlessly...
The other issue is really just ChucK's selling point. It is the only sound programming environment I know of that doesn't have any serial i/o capability... and it seems like a good idea to me to address this.
Anyway, that's my 2 cents...
--ss
On 2012-03-04, at 2:09 PM, trzewiczek wrote:
Hi,
I'm not C++ dev, so I won't help you with the serial implementation, but from the teaching perspective I think it's a very good idea (and actually some opportunity) to teach beginers solving problems with different tools and use interoperability protocols like OSC or MIDI. The very next time your students need some graphics or camera as a sensor, they know it's easy to use some other tools, like Processing and connect it with ChucK or whatever they use. There is a lot of good commercial software that works just fine with these protocols, so then after the course is over, your student will be used to connecting software in all directions. The classic example for me is using Modul8 - OSX VJing software that has quite a complete OSC namespace, so you can easily use it with SC3 or ChucK to create advanced, interactive visualizations during the performance.
trzewiczek
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Stephen David Beck wrote:
I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
=============== Stephen David Beck Haymon Professor of Music Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
O: 225-578-2594 C: 225-223-0344 skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood
wrote: Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
Hi All,
While this is by no means a solution, I have had some success using serial
to midi converters.
Mainly, I have used this to map a gyroscope reading from arduino in to
midi, which was then
read by ChucK. Overall, this method is rather temperamental and
unpredictable,
though sometimes that yields interesting results.
I have not yet looked around to see what similar things have been done,
though I
presume there is a better solution somewhere.
Ethan
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Dan Trueman
totally! would be great for it to have serial!
On Mar 4, 2012, at 4:46 PM, Scott Smallwood wrote:
I agree that OSC is good to teach - and I always do... but again, most of my students are beginners, and my preferred approach is teach a sound programming environment, then map controllers via laptop controls, MIDI, then HID, then raw sensors via serial / Arduino. It's just a nice package.
THEN OSC comes into play for interfacing between iphones, other environments, wireless devices, etc.
But you are correct: it's really important to introduce these protocols as early as possible so that students can navigate all of these environments effortlessly...
The other issue is really just ChucK's selling point. It is the only sound programming environment I know of that doesn't have any serial i/o capability... and it seems like a good idea to me to address this.
Anyway, that's my 2 cents...
--ss
On 2012-03-04, at 2:09 PM, trzewiczek wrote:
Hi,
I'm not C++ dev, so I won't help you with the serial implementation, but from the teaching perspective I think it's a very good idea (and actually some opportunity) to teach beginers solving problems with different tools and use interoperability protocols like OSC or MIDI. The very next time your students need some graphics or camera as a sensor, they know it's easy to use some other tools, like Processing and connect it with ChucK or whatever they use. There is a lot of good commercial software that works just fine with these protocols, so then after the course is over, your student will be used to connecting software in all directions. The classic example for me is using Modul8 - OSX VJing software that has quite a complete OSC namespace, so you can easily use it with SC3 or ChucK to create advanced, interactive visualizations during the performance.
trzewiczek
On Sun, 4 Mar 2012, Stephen David Beck wrote:
I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
=============== Stephen David Beck Haymon Professor of Music Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
O: 225-578-2594 C: 225-223-0344 skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood < scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca> wrote:
Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 02:46:09PM -0700, Scott Smallwood wrote:
The other issue is really just ChucK's selling point. It is the only sound programming environment I know of that doesn't have any serial i/o capability... and it seems like a good idea to me to address this.
I agree. I also think that once students (in school or otherwise) figure out how to connect things they will want to create systems that have as few components as possible. By the time we can implement and debug complicated systems I think we'll also prefer to spend our time playing the simplest version over debugging a complex one. Another matter is realtime performance; steps like OSC, no matter how fast, won't do the responsiveness of the overall system any good. Yours, Kas.
Hey Scott and Steve,
We have a similar problem with the course here at CCRMA that does a
lot of Arduino stuff, and TAing that course this past year (and having
to wrestle with Pd) has really compelled me to make serial support
happen for ChucK.
Given that ChucK has file I/O now, its mostly a task of providing
access to all of the serial config stuff (baud rate, etc.) and adding
binary file I/O. I can let you guys know when thats taken shape more,
but as a far goal-post, personally I think CCRMA needs this by next
fall.
spencer
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Stephen David Beck
I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
=============== Stephen David Beck Haymon Professor of Music Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
O: 225-578-2594 C: 225-223-0344 skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood
wrote: Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
Awesome! Speaking of CCRMA: I've been using Satellite CCRMA quite a bit on the Beagleboard... and it would be SO much nicer to work with ChucK on this platform but, again, I chose Pd for the last project I did because I just wanted simplicity... (and I don't know Supercollider all that well yet). Anyway - I'm probably not of much help with coding this, but I'm happy to help debug/test! PS: I was able to get an LED to light on the Arduino using file I/O stuff, but not much more than that... But yes things are close... --ss On 2012-03-04, at 2:17 PM, Spencer Salazar wrote:
Hey Scott and Steve,
We have a similar problem with the course here at CCRMA that does a lot of Arduino stuff, and TAing that course this past year (and having to wrestle with Pd) has really compelled me to make serial support happen for ChucK.
Given that ChucK has file I/O now, its mostly a task of providing access to all of the serial config stuff (baud rate, etc.) and adding binary file I/O. I can let you guys know when thats taken shape more, but as a far goal-post, personally I think CCRMA needs this by next fall.
spencer
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Stephen David Beck
wrote: I have a similar situation with a class that we are teaching. But the students have already learned Processing basics and ChucK basics before they do Arduino. So getting them to connect the Arduino to ChucK using Processing and OSC is not a problem.
But I would be equally interested in a serial communication solution.
Steve
Sent from my iPad. Please forgive any typos.
=============== Stephen David Beck Haymon Professor of Music Director, AVATAR Initiative for Digital Media Louisiana State University Baton Rouge, LA. 70803
O: 225-578-2594 C: 225-223-0344 skype/iChat: sdbeck
On Mar 4, 2012, at 12:10 PM, Scott Smallwood
wrote: Hey all,
I'm wondering if anyone on this list knows whether there are any plans to (finally) implement serial communication in ChucK?
I ask because, as someone who has been teaching Arduino-related things, I've basically stopped teaching ChucK in favour of Pd, simply because there isn't any way to get communication happening between ChucK and Arduino except through a third environment (like Processing via OSC or something).
I understand that it isn't that difficult to do this via OSC and Processing (or java or whatever), but it introduces an unfortunate stumbling block for beginners, and I find that it is just easier to teach in an environment that has native serial communication abilities (like Pd, Supercollider, etc). But really, I'd MUCH rather teach ChucK, as I find that it is such a good teaching language and has so many out-of-the-box features thanks to the native implementation of percolate...
I posed this question a couple of years ago and it seemed like there was lots of interest in making this happen, but as far as I know, nobody has stepped up.
Any thoughts?
--ss
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ]
S c o t t S m a l l w o o d
composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta
scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
[ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] - [ - ] S c o t t S m a l l w o o d composer, sound artist faculty of arts, u of alberta scott.smallwood@ualberta.ca http://www.scott-smallwood.com http://www.ecnedive.com
participants (7)
-
Dan Trueman
-
ethan cowan
-
Kassen
-
Scott Smallwood
-
Spencer Salazar
-
Stephen David Beck
-
trzewiczek