I usually google "ChucK audio" (without the quotes), which gives me the chuck site as the first match. /Stefan 2010/9/5 Tambet

On 5 September 2010 05:57, mik wrote:

...

Op 05-09-10 04:13, Tambet schreef:

just "ChucK" gives a movie

...

but the second hit is ChucK.

It's 8-th for me ...Google learns a bit about you (for example, Java programmer gets Java pages first). Even YouTube learns and suggests ;)

But the point is - how to search just a list of many top-rated pages about ChucK? And, especially, how to do video search?

...

m _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!

I hear constant moaning about "ChucK lacks features", now "ChucK is to short". WTF? Use something else if you don´t like it. Basti Am 05.09.2010 um 16:24 schrieb Renato Fabbri:

2010/9/5 Stefan Blixt :

...

I usually google "ChucK audio" (without the quotes), which gives me the chuck site as the first match.

same here. rf

...

/Stefan

2010/9/5 Tambet

...

On 5 September 2010 05:57, mik wrote:

...

Op 05-09-10 04:13, Tambet schreef:

...

just "ChucK" gives a movie

but the second hit is ChucK.

It's 8-th for me ...Google learns a bit about you (for example, Java programmer gets Java pages first). Even YouTube learns and suggests ;) But the point is - how to search just a list of many top-rated pages about ChucK? And, especially, how to do video search?

...

m _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- GNU/Linux User #479299 skype: fabbri.renato _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

For the "ChucK lacks features that Java has" part one can use Java & ChucK side by side. Or just use C++ and nothing else. Or write your own (and don´t forget to include all those features you requested - even if they require years of full time work by large development teams) Concerning the name there is an island that needs a new name much more urgently: When typing Java into Google something else than the island is found first! We really should start a petition. First we must rename the island because typing "Java island" is too much work. Second we must rename ChucK because typing "ChucK language" or "ChucK audio" is too much work. Basti Am 05.09.2010 um 18:02 schrieb Hans Aberg:

Suggestions?

On 5 Sep 2010, at 16:45, Bastian Schumacher wrote:

...

I hear constant moaning about "ChucK lacks features", now "ChucK is to short". WTF? Use something else if you don´t like it.

Basti

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

Chuck is really good on the musical side. Java is very strong on all the other things, mostly asynchronous control stuff. I´m currently working on a project. I programmed a drum machine in Java to test my drum machine concept. Offline rendering works like a charm and is very fast. But during realtime playback sometimes when the garbage collector chimes in there is a tiny crackle in the sound. And the latency is rather high. So I decided to use ChucK. I want to use OSC and MIDI to control things via Java and a dedicated hardware control panel in conjunction with my Bachelor Thesis. I don´t think we need basically functionality in ChucK that are featuread "in almost any language we know" like it has been said. We can do those things in a language of our choice and use a transmission protocol for communication. I think at least at the stage where ChucK is now improving the protocol support (e.g. supporting OSC packages) and adding things that already have been pre-planned (e.g. "private") makes more sense. At least from my point of view it would be very much work to get all those well known features into ChucK. IMO things should be kept simple, then it´s easier to keep things predictable. Am 05.09.2010 um 19:46 schrieb Hans Aberg:

So what setup do you have in your mind? If one uses Java and ChucK side by side, or C++ and nothing else, aren't one going to miss the musical features of ChuCK when working in those other languages?

On 5 Sep 2010, at 18:25, Bastian Schumacher wrote:

...

For the "ChucK lacks features that Java has" part one can use Java & ChucK side by side. Or just use C++ and nothing else. Or write your own (and don´t forget to include all those features you requested - even if they require years of full time work by large development teams)

[...]

Basti

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

On Sun, 2010-09-05 at 04:57 +0200, mik wrote:

Op 05-09-10 04:13, Tambet schreef:

...

just "ChucK" gives a movie

but the second hit is ChucK.

"chuck language" gives you the lang specs. "chuck sound" gives you the main page. It looks like it is fine as it is. There are probably better things to spend time on. -- Fernando