Hi everyone, Which is the latest stable CVS (or SVN) of miniAudicle/Chuck for OS X? I didn't have luck googling (sorry if this has been asked before). The latest release of miniAudicle is version 0.1.3.9 (with ChucK: version 1.2.1.2 (dracula)) Both are fairly old (more that a year as far as I can tell), so I'd love to get the latest version. Thanks! Juan-Pablo
Hi everyone,
Hey there!
Which is the latest stable CVS (or SVN) of miniAudicle/Chuck for OS X? I didn't have luck googling (sorry if this has been asked before). The latest release of miniAudicle is version 0.1.3.9 (with ChucK: version 1.2.1.2(dracula)) Both are fairly old (more that a year as far as I can tell), so I'd love to get the latest version.
I think there must be some mistake there. 1.2.1.2 was new this summer, I think. Could it be that it's simply the date that's wrong? Yours, Kas.
Hi Kassen! Kassen wrote:
Which is the latest stable CVS (or SVN) of miniAudicle/Chuck for OS X? I didn't have luck googling (sorry if this has been asked before). The latest release of miniAudicle is version 0.1.3.9 http://0.1.3.9 (with ChucK: version 1.2.1.2 http://1.2.1.2 (dracula)) Both are fairly old (more that a year as far as I can tell), so I'd love to get the latest version.
I think there must be some mistake there. 1.2.1.2 http://1.2.1.2 was new this summer, I think. Could it be that it's simply the date that's wrong?
Yes, you're right. I was confusing it with 1.2.1.1. Thanks for the clarification! One question, are you guys using the stable release or most of you are using the cvs? I am curious in terms of how stable/unstable they might be. Juan-Pablo
Hi Kassen!
Hi, Juan-Pablo! Yes, you're right. I was confusing it with 1.2.1.1. Thanks for the
clarification!
Cool. Actually I wasn't aware that the Mac version of the mini was already using 1.2.1.2, the official Linux and Windows versions are lagging right now, that is; unless there was a update I didn't hear about.
One question, are you guys using the stable release or most of you are using the cvs? I am curious in terms of how stable/unstable they might be.
I think nearly everyone is using the official bin releases (or compiling a new one when there is a official release). Personally I try to stay as compatible with everyone else as I can because of the never-ending search for bugs and the need to be able to talk about those but I do run a few non-standard things like a ASIO version of ChucK on Windows and a tweaked version of the Mini to use the latest ChucK on Linux. I have no idea how unstable the CVS versions may be. I also wonder how you would find out what has been improved/changed in the CVS versions. Unless you have a good reason to use them (like a specific bug that causes you issues that you know was fixed in CVS) I'd say you may be better off with the official builds. It's just easier to be able to collaborate on pinpointing bugs when you know everybody is on more or less the same version. There are some differences between the different OS's but none that seem very signifficant so far. Then again; maybe you simply like to live on the bleeding edge, in that case you should go for it. Hope that helps? Kas.
participants (2)
-
Juan-Pablo Caceres -
Kassen