On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 00:39:06 +0200, "Atte André Jensen" said:

Scott Davidson wrote:

...

Emacs and command line chucking works well, but Audicle would be nice :)

I agree that a more streamlined environment is needed. It would be nice with a better emacs mode (better indention, comment/uncomment region and the ability to list and add shreds from within emacs).

But I'm also looking forward to trying out (mini)Audicle under linux...

The newest chuck-mode does inclue commands for listing, adding, removing and replacing shreds, but no (un)comment region yet. it's on the wiki. -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Choose from over 50 domains or use your own

Atte André Jensen wrote:

Wow, I'll grab that, thanks...

It's nice, thanks. -- peace, love & harmony Atte http://www.atte.dk | quartet: http://www.anagrammer.dk http://www.atte.dk/gps | compositions: http://www.atte.dk/compositions

Hi, I was using DeMuDi (based on Debian), but it's repositories don't match well with Debian main, so the prerequisites of Chuck were breaking all my apps. Rather, apt-get would offer to uninstall all my favorite apps. I finally compiled Chuck for Jack on Fedora Core 4 (after installing jack, of course) with success. It's just not as fast on that box as it would be on my realtime kernel with DeMuDi. I should say, Jack's latency is lower with a realtime kernel. I'm not sure how the kernel would affect Chuck. Is Chuck's performance better on Linux than on Windows or Mac OS? Anyone do any tests? Cheers, Mike On 6/18/06, Scott Davidson wrote:

sorry, forgot to mention:

...

...

what your machine's like

compal cl-56 Pentium-M laptop, 1GB ram

-- http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- "ooh aah bleep" -miraton

Hi, I remember that thread. I'll have to run that code and see on my various boxen. I'm really interested on Chuck's performance difference between patched and unpatched versions of the kernel. If I ever get around to compiling my own patched kernel **shudders** I'll post those results. Thanks everyone! Mike On 6/19/06, Adam Tindale wrote:

Hi,

I can't give you a REAL answer but some hints. I am in the middle of getting my powerbook dual booting gentoo and osx. ChucK seems to work fine, but I haven't done any real major tests or applied the realtime patches to the kernel yet. I'll post more in a few weeks after my packages stop compiling :)

What I do know is that Ge uses 10.3.9 on his powerbook as his main development box. He does an admirable job of compiling ChucK on windows and linux before releases and regularly spends chunks of time devoted to each port. While I know that all ports work, I am sure that osx will probably "run the best", maybe not the fastest, but probably with the least bugs and easiest to install. Other people have reported problems like yours when trying to install ChucK on different flavours of linux.

There was this thread on the mailing list in February but it didn't get too far.

https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/2006-February/ 000336.html

Good luck with ChucK.

--art

On 19-Jun-06, at 8:00 AM, mike clemow wrote:

...

Hi,

I was using DeMuDi (based on Debian), but it's repositories don't match well with Debian main, so the prerequisites of Chuck were breaking all my apps. Rather, apt-get would offer to uninstall all my favorite apps.

I finally compiled Chuck for Jack on Fedora Core 4 (after installing jack, of course) with success. It's just not as fast on that box as it would be on my realtime kernel with DeMuDi. I should say, Jack's latency is lower with a realtime kernel. I'm not sure how the kernel would affect Chuck.

Is Chuck's performance better on Linux than on Windows or Mac OS? Anyone do any tests?

Cheers, Mike

On 6/18/06, Scott Davidson wrote:

...

sorry, forgot to mention:

...

...

what your machine's like

compal cl-56 Pentium-M laptop, 1GB ram

-- http://www.fastmail.fm - One of many happy users: http://www.fastmail.fm/docs/quotes.html

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

--

"ooh aah bleep" -miraton _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- "ooh aah bleep" -miraton