Hello, yes, it is possible to create a point-to-point network btw the two laptops. So we can use OSC to send message btw the them. In general, we need the "now" at the two ChucK process being the "same". We need to sync the shreds pulse. Thanks. 2011/11/16

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

is it possible to get the 2 copies of chuck to talk to each other and to do the sync'ing for you?

On 11/16/2011 10:05 AM, Vilson Vieira wrote:

...

Hey chuckists!

As a part of a live-coding performance we are going to do next Sunday, we are trying to realize the best way to sync two laptops running chuck --loop, each one running their own shreds and sending their own audio output.

Any suggestion?

Thanks.

_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOw/ccAAoJEIaKvi7tbzRHNNAH/38ucDeaCN6fT6bdyKlNO2Pf oGIgu6BmLWlPrv92JH3SFhaJ6oe/kX0mgPSGxBNbWoIG/VjaoYOnq2ZfQ2fATBLj royPEZwnNPjDw4l5UVS3OSh2YnDW0NI7gWcvl31BVNWrHQxtKgpysFsiYj6nazNe eYr5U0qs/6XeXaYi5cf3xg0UqopWLzdU8I/oQOPGd듯蒱쑂ፌ䐐� WbNFTfCGCHAQZhO5ijtw6WG9VeYrtEKC2jgRyFUgWdEFHdPR/WUe77c4ua20JQAe bKXWTgBpEtCutga7CQS9nE25qEny7e1zqPXeqYF36a2EUMvAMJLNuGF2A0HKzrM= =CDHd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-- Vilson Vieira vilson@void.cc ((( http://automata.cc ))) ((( http://musa.cc )))

What about sending a phasor ramp with a optical cable and using delta to sync your stuff? Am 16.11.2011 um 23:04 schrieb Kassen:

On 16/11/2011, Vilson Vieira wrote:

...

Hello,

yes, it is possible to create a point-to-point network btw the two laptops. So we can use OSC to send message btw the them. In general, we need the "now" at the two ChucK process being the "same". We need to sync the shreds pulse.

Yes, that seems to be the way it should "intuitively" work, I agree. As it stands this will only be true if and only if both VM's were started at the same moment. Theoretically you could accomplish that, but that means no restarting of a single VM after a crash.

I remember some work was being done on a new syncing system at -I think- Princeton. If I remember correctly there would also be a investigation of how this syncing might be made compattible with the Netclock initiative ( http://netclock.slab.org/ ). Netclock, to refresh, is a initiative hoping to provide sync between a range of systems (SC, PD, with Fluxus support planned and hopefully ChucK will join) for exactly this kind of use.

Were there any results of that?

Yours, Kas. _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users