Re: [chuck-users] Electronic ChucK
I threw together a quick starter web page with a somewhat funny introduction. It has links to the Eagle CAD files so you can download them and check them out. So far there is only the Power and ADC microphone interface. Here is the link: http://www.freedomodds.com/music/echuck/index.html I think that perhaps the next most important module for me to create is a computer interface module. Please let me know what other things you would like to see on the page or created next. Also if you would like to contribute in some way, tell me that as well. Cheers! Les (Inventor)
Why do you need to design another computer interface module? Unless I am not
understanding what this is, why not use one that already exists like
Arduino? Seems that you are going to force users to learn yet another
interface.
Mike
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 5:15 PM,
I threw together a quick starter web page with a somewhat funny introduction. It has links to the Eagle CAD files so you can download them and check them out. So far there is only the Power and ADC microphone interface. Here is the link:
http://www.freedomodds.com/music/echuck/index.html
I think that perhaps the next most important module for me to create is a computer interface module. Please let me know what other things you would like to see on the page or created next. Also if you would like to contribute in some way, tell me that as well. Cheers!
Les (Inventor) _______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
-- Peace may sound simple—one beautiful word— but it requires everything we have, every quality, every strength, every dream, every high ideal. —Yehudi Menuhin (1916–1999), musician
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:53 AM, Mike McGonagle
Why do you need to design another computer interface module? Unless I am not understanding what this is, why not use one that already exists like Arduino? Seems that you are going to force users to learn yet another interface.
Mike
Well, multiplicity of options should be available, for the simple reason that...well, lets say I am in India, but Arduino was designed in Italy, so there is a good chance that some key component will not be readily or cheaply available to me here (India). So if people have put up multiple designs for interfacing then I have a good chance of finding a design whose components ARE available here. Also, costs. Flexi is an Indian clone of Arduino, and it costs less than $50. ------- -.- 1/f ))) --. ------- ... http://www.algomantra.com
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:06 AM, AlgoMantra
Well, multiplicity of options should be available, for the simple reason that...well, lets say I am in India, but Arduino was designed in Italy, so there is a good chance that some key component will not be readily or cheaply available to me here (India).
Surely the chances of being able to find compatible components generally decreases proportional to the number of different standards.
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:06 AM, AlgoMantra
wrote: Well, multiplicity of options should be available, for the simple reason that...well, lets say I am in India, but Arduino was designed in Italy, so there is a good chance that some key component will not be readily or cheaply available to me here (India).
Surely the chances of being able to find compatible components generally decreases proportional to
the number of different standards.
Ah, but that's also a question of semantics, viz. what is a design apropos a standard? There are various Arduino clones, not just one - so they would fall under the same standard I suppose. I guess you do have a point though. ------- -.- 1/f ))) --. ------- ... http://www.algomantra.com
But while there are many different Arduino clones, several of them use the
same programming interface. I guess what I am getting at is why reinvent the
wheel. I wasn't thinking so much about the components used, but the
programming (software) side of things. Having one common interface would
allow for anyone to use any system, and yet, only having to learn one
programming environment. I really do understand about the options of
hardware, but with all this code out there already that is FREE and FREELY
downloadable ANYWHERE, it only makes sense to not force new users or your
hardware modules, who might already know the programming interface of
Arduino, to have to learn another system.
Mike
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:14 AM, AlgoMantra
On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 3:06 AM, AlgoMantra
wrote: Well, multiplicity of options should be available, for the simple reason that...well, lets say I am in India, but Arduino was designed in Italy, so there is a good chance that some key component will not be readily or cheaply available to me here (India).
Surely the chances of being able to find compatible components generally decreases proportional to
the number of different standards.
Ah, but that's also a question of semantics, viz. what is a design apropos a standard? There are various Arduino clones, not just one - so they would fall under the same standard I suppose. I guess you do have a point though.
------- -.- 1/f ))) --. ------- ... http://www.algomantra.com
_______________________________________________ chuck-users mailing list chuck-users@lists.cs.princeton.edu https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
-- Peace may sound simple—one beautiful word— but it requires everything we have, every quality, every strength, every dream, every high ideal. —Yehudi Menuhin (1916–1999), musician
participants (4)
-
AlgoMantra
-
inventor-66@comcast.net
-
Mike McGonagle
-
Peter Todd