Hi list, I have just implemented my first simple test class in C and I had no problem linking it statically into the chuck executable and importing it (by adding a couple of lines to chuck_compile.cpp. But this is probably not the intended / most elegant way of deploying contributions :-) I read about ckx files in the developer's guide http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/doc/develop/ Sounds like "The Way" (tm). so... any additional api/compiler flags needed to create those ckx files? how do I load them from within chuck? Could you point me to some examples? Thanks, --lu
Hi!
I have just implemented my first simple test class in C and I had no problem linking it statically into the chuck executable and importing it (by adding a couple of lines to chuck_compile.cpp.
Schweet!
But this is probably not the intended / most elegant way of deploying contributions :-)
Nope, though unfortunately for all, it is for ChucK...
I read about ckx files in the developer's guide http://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/doc/develop/ Sounds like "The Way" (tm).
Yes, .ckx files are indeed intended to be "The Way" (tm). They were mostly working in the old frankenstein chuck release, but due to framework "enhancements" in chuck-1.2 ckx import was disabled and we haven't gotten around to putting it back.
so... any additional api/compiler flags needed to create those ckx files? how do I load them from within chuck? Could you point me to some examples?
Unfortunately, there is not much we can do at this point until the ckx import feature returns (and return it shall, though the timetable is unclear). Best, Ge!
participants (2)
-
Ge Wang
-
Lukas Degener