[SSW 17] and subsequent works seek to understand the minimum manipulability among all "reasonable"' tournament rules (i.e. tournament rules so that if team i beats team j, and also all teams that j beats, then i appears above j in the ranking with probability 1), when these two teams fix the match between them.
Our work instead considers the possibility that two teams may both fix the match between them, and additionally throw matches to outside teams (that is, they can intentionally lose a match to a non-colluding team that they could have won). Our main result establishes that no two teams can gain more than 1/3 in expected prize winnings in Nested Randomized King of the Hill (introduced in [DFRSW 22], similar to QuickSort), by together fixing their match and throwing matches to external teams. This is optimal, as any "reasonable'' tournament admits the possibility of two teams gaining 1/3 in expected prize-winnings just by fixing the match between them.