Learning, Adversaries, and Limited Feedback Jake Abernethy, UC Berkeley Monday, April 12, 2010 4:30pm Small Auditorium, CS 105 A basic assumption often made in Machine Learning is that the data we observe are independent and identically distributed. But is this really necessary? Is it even realistic in typical scenarios? A number of recent results provide guarantees for arbitrary (or even adversarially-generated) data sequences. It turns out, for a wide class of problems, the learner's performance is no worse when the data is assumed to be arbitrary as opposed to i.i.d. This result involves a nice application of the Minimax theorem, which I'll briefly describe. I'll also delve into a more challenging problem: the "bandit" setting, in which the learner receives only very little feedback on each example. It was unknown for some time whether there exists an efficient algorithm that achieves the same guarantee for non-i.i.d. data for a general class of learning/decision problems. I'll present the first known such bandit algorithm, and I'll sketch the central ideas behind the technique, borrowing several tricks from the Interior Point optimization literature.