[chuck-dev] coding suggestions
Ge Wang
gewang at CS.Princeton.EDU
Mon Jul 26 21:29:31 EDT 2004
On Jul 26, 2004, at 7:29 PM, Niklas Werner wrote:
> I'd like to suggest the following:
>
> use GNU getopt() for the command line options (--optionArgument is just
> greatly confusing: --option Argument is so much nicer, and you get rid
> of
> all the else if() in chuck_main.
good idea - how standard is getopt()? --option Argument is certainly
better.
if it is very standard (or we can contain getopt in distribution), then
we should
look into use it.
> Your next_power_2() function seems to waste loads of cycles, although
> this
> doesn't really matter, as it is only used at startup, but wouldn't that
> be a nice feature for the language anyway?
you are right. the code that you posted is integrated - also added to
ulib_math.
Thanks Niklas.
Ge!
More information about the chuck-dev
mailing list