[chuck-dev] Re: The ChucK Manual prerelease
adamtindale at hotmail.com
Tue Nov 22 23:04:32 EST 2005
I still don't have well-formed thoughts here. My preference is to
have people people modify the cvs tree and send diffs or patches. I
am assuming that people on the dev list have been accessing cvs
anonymously if they haven't been given accounts. The manual is in doc/
It is all done in latex. As much as I would love to put it up on the
wiki, it would take a lot of work to extract it and reformat it.
Another issue. What is the wiki for? I am inclined to have the manual
and html docs be for reference and the wiki be a place for people to
post their patches and discuss bugs and workarounds and community-
I am very excited about having help and feedback on the docs. None of
what I am saying is meant to poopoo any ideas, I just don't have
time to do the convert and then manage the docs in three places...
On 21-Nov-05, at 1:49 AM, Ge Wang wrote:
>> Adam Tindale <adamtindale at hotmail.com> writes:
>>> I have been working on the manual for almost a year.
>> How about putting it on the wiki and let us all work on it?;).
> I think this is a really great idea. Adam should probably lead the
> effort, if he wants. Thoughts? Adam? anyone else?
> chuck-dev mailing list
> chuck-dev at lists.cs.princeton.edu
More information about the chuck-dev