[chuck-users] performance under linux
gewang at CS.Princeton.EDU
Sun Dec 18 03:20:22 EST 2005
>> > chuck --bufsize128 foo.ck
> That would translate to 1/44100 * 2 (stereo) * 2 (16 bit is two bytes)
> * 128 = 11,6 ms of latency, right?
the 128 refers to audio frames, and not bytes - so it's closer to 50ms
latency from audio buffering, I think.
>> Try different powers of two to hopefully find a good balance between
>> latency and stability.
> That works great. Chorus still seems to be quite hungry. One aspect I
> still need to try out is using a single one and not two Chorus'es
> since it's now stereo as far as I unerstand.
Hmm... We haven't modified Chorus to be stereo yet. It's on the queue
of things to implement (and nowhere else).
More information about the chuck-users