[chuck-users] fun dur GetT() rises to invalid type

Ge Wang gewang at CS.Princeton.EDU
Sun Dec 18 03:42:33 EST 2005

Hi all,

On Dec 15, 2005, at 8:59 PM, Spencer Salazar wrote:

> it seems that the :: operator has precedence over the . operator (or  
> they have the same precedence and are evaluated left to right), so

Yeah right on.  (:: has the same precedence as .)

The precedence of :: has been brought into question before:


Perhaps it's time to modify this.  For now, we have boosted .  
precedence over :: (now in CVS).  Thoughts?


More information about the chuck-users mailing list