[chuck-users] fun dur GetT() rises to invalid type
gewang at CS.Princeton.EDU
Sun Dec 18 03:42:33 EST 2005
On Dec 15, 2005, at 8:59 PM, Spencer Salazar wrote:
> it seems that the :: operator has precedence over the . operator (or
> they have the same precedence and are evaluated left to right), so
Yeah right on. (:: has the same precedence as .)
The precedence of :: has been brought into question before:
Perhaps it's time to modify this. For now, we have boosted .
precedence over :: (now in CVS). Thoughts?
More information about the chuck-users