[chuck-users] arrays holding arrays?

[Kassen]

Spencer wrote;


> Thats the joy/pain of references...



I suspected so.


Copy one by one is the only way to go, as painful as that sounds.
> This makes a good case for a copy() method in array classes.


Well, it's not all *that* bad, I'm already happy I didn't need to manually
define 8 arrays...

Thanks for the explanation.

Kas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20060804/27a16ecc/attachment-0001.htm