[chuck-users] Distributing ChucK

[Ollie Glass]

Mike,

not nosey at all, I could happily talk about it for a week but I'll
keep this description short :-) It's an intelligent drum machine for
live breakbeat manipulation above the note level. You can read more
and download it from www.blackholeprojector.com.

Please excuse my slow reply, have been on holiday.

Olllie

> Ollie,
>
> Pardon me for being nosey, but what does your app do?  ;-)
>
> Regards,
> Mike
>
> On 6/24/06, Ollie Glass <ollieglaskovik at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Brilliant, thanks very much for clearing up the details.
> >
> > > if you are
> > > just distributing chuck in the same zip file or something, and the
> > > two programs interact through on-the-fly commands, OSC, or some other
> > > IPC mechanism, then thats okay.
> > >
> >
> > This is exactly what I'm doing, without modifying ChucK. I'll be in
> > touch when I release the package.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ollie
> >
> >
> >
> > > Though, if you do distribute chuck, you also have to distribute the
> > > chuck source for at least 3 years after you last distribute it,
> > > including modifications, if you made any.  This can be as direct as
> > > bundling the source with the chuck binary, or as indirect as sending
> > > someone a CD with the source on it.  (Assuming you arent distributing
> > > a modified binary, you can actually just link to the chuck webpage.)
> > > If you dont include the source with the binary, you have to indicate
> > > somehow how people can get the source.
> > >
> > > Also, you have to include a copy of the GPL (available as the file
> > > COPYING in the chuck download, among other places) directly with the
> > > chuck executable.
> > >
> > > whew... hope this helps,
> > > spencer
> > >
> > > On Jun 23, 2006, at 2:44 PM, Ollie Glass wrote:
> > >
> > > > My app isn't open source. Is it okay to distribute ChucK with it?
> > > >
> > > > Sorry if this seems like an obvious question, I'm not very clear on
> > > > licences and don't want to make a mistake.
> > > >
> > > > Ollie
> > > >
> > > >> Yes!
> > > >>
> > > >> The GNU public license allows you to freely modify and distribute
> > > >> derivative
> > > >> works as long as you give due credit and provide the source code
> > > >> for free.
> > > >> If you look closely inside ChucK you will find RTMidi and RTAudio
> > > >> by Gary
> > > >> Scavone and libsndfile by Eric de Castro Lopo.
> > > >>
> > > >> Let us know when you are finished packaging your app.
> > > >>
> > > >> --art
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 22-Jun-06, at 2:26 AM, Ollie Glass wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> I'd like to distribute ChucK with my app, saving users from
> > > >>
> > > >> downloading it seperatly. Is it ok to do this?
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Ollie
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >>
> > > >> chuck-users mailing list
> > > >>
> > > >> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> > > >>
> > > >> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> chuck-users mailing list
> > > >> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> > > >> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > chuck-users mailing list
> > > > chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> > > > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > chuck-users mailing list
> > chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> > https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
> >
>
>
> --
>
> "ooh aah bleep"
> -miraton
>