[chuck-users] benchmarking chuck

eduard aylon eduard.aylon at gmail.com
Tue May 2 19:10:08 EDT 2006

On May 3, 2006, at 12:58 AM, Perry R Cook wrote:

> OK, here's the deal with that original code.
>       s1 @=>  a[counter] => dac;
> The first Chuck does assignment (replaces that
> member of the array with s1.  The 2nd Chuck
> connects it to the dac.  The @ part of the
> operator signifies assignment.  So it's all legal,
> but maybe confusing.

I understand  @ as "reference to". Same as & in C. Is this the  
correct way of understanding it?

More information about the chuck-users mailing list