[chuck-users] stk Ugens between 1.2.0.6 -> 7

[Ge Wang]

Hi Graham!

I think we just found the problem this morning (while tracking down 
strange Envelope behavior for some of the PLOrk pieces)!  It turns out 
that I had introduced a simple but rather significant bug into the STK 
envelope while adding the new functionalities for 1.2.0.7.  This 
resulted in strange behavior in Envelope and ADSR, as well as in a good 
number of the STK instruments which internally use Envelope.

This is now fixed and in CVS.  Furthermore, Spencer has worked hard to 
post new versions of chuck and miniAudicle.  The newest version number 
is now 1.2.0.7b.  A new audicle build is also on the way.  We highly 
recommend that you update to this new version.

Very sorry about this not so little bug.  Please let us know if the new 
version indeed fixes the problems.

Best,
Ge!

On Oct 26, 2006, at 11:37 PM, Graham Coleman wrote:

> More details:
>
> It seems that for the builds that I have,
> audicle 1.0.0.4 and chuck 1.2.0.7 on win32
>
> the following STK ugens are not totally disconnected,
> but start very very soft and take a while to get louder?
>
> Clarinet, ModalBar, BlowHole, Saxofony, VoicForm
>
> Haven't figured out what could be causing this yet.
>
> best,
>
> Graham
>
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2006, Graham Coleman wrote:
>
>> ChucKtivists,
>>
>> I'm having a problem with some of the Stk Ugens in 1.2.0.7--
>> certain Stk instruments no longer seem to play.
>>
>> Originally I noticed the problem in audicle 1.0.0.4 from 1.0.0.3.
>> I prepared musical material for a local music competition using ...3
>> to be risk averse, but ...4 doesn't seem to play the parts using these
>> instruments. Then I tracked it back to chuck.
>>
>> testStk.ck should demonstrate the basic problem--
>> if you are subject you may only hear one scale by one instrument 
>> (1.2.0.7)
>>
>> testStkAll.ck tests the whole gamut of StkInstruments.
>>
>> I have not yet tested the STK Ugens that are not StkInstruments.
>>
>> I'm on win32 and using lots of deprecated names, but hopefully neither
>> make a difference.
>>
>> has anyone else seen this?
>>
>> best,
>>
>> Graham
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users