[chuck-users] heads up for 1.2.0.7

[Spencer Salazar]

On the subject of nomenclature, is anyone else thinking about the  
relative merits of LPF, HPF, BPF, etc. vs. LowPass, HighPass,  
BandPass, etc.?  Obviously the acronym versions are faster to type,  
which would be important in live-coding situations.  However it seems  
to me that spelling them out fits in more with the current ugen  
naming scheme, might be a little easier to read, and also might be a  
little easier to understand for people new to electronic music.

(I dont have a huge vested interest in either way--just wanted to  
throw out a few thoughts before things get set in stone in the next  
release.)

spencer

On Sep 11, 2006, at 4:26 PM, Ollie Glass wrote:

> I think the CamelCase is great, it brings ChucK syntax a little
> closer to Java which suits me :-)
>
> I've found deprecations very useful in Java to smooth transitions
> between versions, glad they're being used in ChucK.
>
> Would love to see VST input and output, audio and midi.
>
> Ollie
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users