[chuck-users] Lisa, voice-gain convolution, etc.
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Mon May 14 21:02:46 EDT 2007
On 5/15/07, dan trueman <dtrueman at princeton.edu> wrote:
> hi Kas, wow i never thought LiSa would ever be used to approximate
> convolution; cool!
Approximate? I thought that my outlined method came down to actual
convolution but it's entirely possible that I grossly misunderstand what's
involved; this happens to me a lot but often it's possible to mask this by
claiming my misunderstanding was actually a completely new idea :¬).
Actually I've been thinking about ChucKian convolution on and off since I
started ChucKing since as I see convolution it deals with spectral
characteristics following from timed information so in a way it fits. It's
just that convolution is notoriously CPU heavy and ChucK is not so famous
brute efficiency (at least not with the CPU's time, it is with mine) so I
never got round to actually coding it up.
More generally I think LiSa might be good for many, many unexpected things
because it's quite general and open to interpertation so that's good.
that's a very easy addition and i can see how it might be generally
> useful; will definitely add.
Wonderfull! Many thanks for your quick responce.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users