[chuck-users] zipper noise

Martin Ahnelöv operagasten at gmail.com
Sat Nov 3 14:28:18 EDT 2007

lör 2007-11-03 klockan 12:31 -0400 skrev Stephen Sinclair:
> > "b.rate" above is probably just a single number but "my_filter.freq()" is a
> > call to a more advanced function and running those, as we debated earlier in
> > the topic, every sample will put a drain on the cpu and there I wonder how
> > much cheaper a C++ implementation will be then a ChucK one.
> >
> But of course, that's not to say that these choices are arbitrary
> either... Obviously they are made to maximize efficiency.  Chucking
> something at freq() would imply a great deal of extra calculations per
> sample.

Hey, guys, before you continue! If this were implemented, ChucK would
also get a "control rate", and the CPU-load would be about the same as
any other realtime audio (programming) app. The difference would be that
you can choose to not use it.


More information about the chuck-users mailing list