[chuck-users] zipper noise

Martin Ahnelöv operagasten at gmail.com
Sat Nov 3 14:28:18 EDT 2007


lör 2007-11-03 klockan 12:31 -0400 skrev Stephen Sinclair:
> > "b.rate" above is probably just a single number but "my_filter.freq()" is a
> > call to a more advanced function and running those, as we debated earlier in
> > the topic, every sample will put a drain on the cpu and there I wonder how
> > much cheaper a C++ implementation will be then a ChucK one.
> >
[...]
> 
> But of course, that's not to say that these choices are arbitrary
> either... Obviously they are made to maximize efficiency.  Chucking
> something at freq() would imply a great deal of extra calculations per
> sample.
> 

Hey, guys, before you continue! If this were implemented, ChucK would
also get a "control rate", and the CPU-load would be about the same as
any other realtime audio (programming) app. The difference would be that
you can choose to not use it.

Gasten



More information about the chuck-users mailing list