[chuck-users] a few language questions

Michael Heuer heuermh at gmail.com
Fri Nov 9 21:52:48 EST 2007

Ge Wang wrote:

> Greetings!
> > AFAIK there is no mechanism to alter the capacity of an array, and at
> > present not much else in the way of handy data structures.  This is
> > something I've been meaning to ask about myself, though.  I've only been
> > using ChucK for a short time...
> Definitely an essential feature.  Dynamic/resizable arrays are currently
> not in the language, but we recently implemented it in ChucK and are
> currently in the testing phase.  Most likely it will be in the next
> release.


Not sure if this mailing list handles attachments or not, but attached
is where I was going with my "List" implementation.  The file also
includes a bunch of small functor classes, something like function

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: list.ck
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 2330 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20071109/ef7e8016/attachment.obj 

More information about the chuck-users mailing list