[chuck-users] SndBuf: setting loop
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Sat Oct 13 05:39:00 EDT 2007
On 10/13/07, dan trueman <dtrueman at princeton.edu> wrote:
> look for this in the next release:
> lisa.valueAt(buf.valueAt(i), i * 1::samp);
Looks very good! Would it be possible to also support this;
buf.valueAt(i) => lisa.valueAt( i::samp);
or is that a given already? This second example looks slightly more ChucKian
to me. Ge?
Also, is LiSa interpolating? Or will we be required to specify a integer
number of samples? Or will it round? Forcing integers wouldn't have to be a
problem because for a arbitrary duration D we could go like this;
(D / samp $ int)::samp
But that could be a question here.
Thanks for taking the time to do this, I look forward to morphing buffers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users