[chuck-users] A problem with the code
samarugalucas at gmail.com
Fri Apr 18 21:05:45 EDT 2008
Yes, I speak Spanish, and with great difficult, English. The Spanish
comments are not important.
And yes, the seg-fault menssage is a linux menssage, not a ChucK menssage
(if I understood what you say).
2008/4/18, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> On 19/04/2008, lucas samaruga <samarugalucas at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi list
> Hi Lucas!
> I'm working with ChucK in a musical project,
> Yay! A wise choice too, much better then ChucK for database management,
> probably. :¬)
> and I have a problem with the code.
> > This code generates 3 different error menssages in my machine
> > (running chuck-alsa on linux), depending on the amount of
> > components in an array.
> I just glanced over it but I suspect at least issue 2) is one of the
> (new?) issues where (un)certain problems of resolving type on arrays (maybe
> especially when using functions) leads to seg-faults.
> There's good news in that Ge is looking into this and I found so far that
> in all cases where I ran into this (if it's the same thing) so far we can
> write around it.
> Another thing worth mentioning is that ChucK shouldn't seg-fault at all.
> Maybe it should kill the shred when the error happens or give a error at
> compilation but not seg-fault and quite working altogether.
> It's rather late here and your comments are in a language I don't speak (I
> think Spanish?) so I hope you'll excuse me if I don't have a solution right
> away but that issue is likely to be fixed relatively soon and I rate suspect
> we could work around it as well. Just not right now :¬)
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users