[chuck-users] SqrOsc.width broken?

[Kassen]

Hey, Adam!

You're back "on the case"? In that case I'll get back to adding issues and
suggestions to the relevant WiKi page as well. Good to hear.

Does ScrOsc have any advantages over PulseOsc at all, BTW? As I mentioned I
don't hear a difference between them at the default settings but maybe
SqrOsc is cheaper as it doesn't need to calculate width?

I added both issues to the WiKi's page on bugs to be fixed in the next
release for convenient tracking.

Cheers,
Kas.

On 24/04/2008, Adam Tindale <adamtindale at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Currently SqrOsc and PulseOsc are broken. Reading from .width does not
> work. I think that SqrOsc.width should just return 0.5 PulseOsc.wdith isn't
> readable but should be. SqrOsc.width is writeable when it shouldn't be.
>
> I'll change the manual in CVS to reflect the current state of these. Maybe
> these could be fixed  in the next release?
>
> Thanks everyone for finding this stuff and problems with the manual. Keep
> em coming and it will all get better over time.
>
> --art
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20080424/d349b836/attachment.html>